View profile

A big win for privacy in South Africa

The day 16 September 2019 will go down in history as possibly a very important date in the world, at
September 17 · Issue #69 · View online
iAfrikan Daily Brief
The day 16 September 2019 will go down in history as possibly a very important date in the world, at minimum in South Africa. It is the day on which the High Court of South Africa ruled that the state is acting unlawfully when conducting indiscriminate bulk interception of communications. The South African government has been given 2 years to remedy the practice and everything else associated with it. - Tefo

Something that has never probably happened anywhere else in the world to date (I stand to be corrected), happened in South Africa on the morning of 16 September 2019. Specifically, Judge Roland Sutherland ruled that the South African government’s “practice of bulk interception of international communications is unlawful.”
In a previous edition of this newsletter and an article on iAfrikanI detailed how, as part of the ongoing court case, South Africa’s State Security Agency was conducting indiscriminate mass surveillance on citizens by tapping, among others, undersea fiber cables. 
The South Gauteng High Court in Johannesburg witnessed history on 16 September 2019 as Judge Roland Sutherland ruled that indiscriminate mass surveillance by the South African state is unlawful.
To illustrate just how important the judgment by Judge Sutherland is, you need to understand that even in the democratic USA after Edward Snowden’s revelations, to my knowledge, the American authorities were only condemned in the court of public opinion for indiscriminate mass surveillance on the country’s citizens, but never in court.
Seriously, the judgement is a big deal. Even Snowden himself exclaimed as much in a tweet.
To highlight, and to make one last point, on how big the judgement is. Just as I was penning this newsletter, the USA’s Justice Department released a statement that it had filed a civil lawsuit against Snowden. This has to do with Snowden’s book, Permanent Record, which has just been released and published today.
They say it is because, by publishing the book, he violated “the non-disclosure agreements he signed with both CIA and NSA.”
“The lawsuit alleges that Snowden published his book without submitting it to the agencies for pre-publication review, in violation of his express obligations under the agreements he signed. Additionally, the lawsuit alleges that Snowden has given public speeches on intelligence-related matters, also in violation of his non-disclosure agreements.” - USA Justice Department
Permanent Record by Edward Snowden
Contrast this with South Africa where not only was a case allowed to be heard and publicly recorded regarding the activities of the country’s State Security Agency, but also the Judge confidently ruled against the state and its bulk interception of communications.
Having said that, as Professor Jane Duncan put it when I spoke to her on Monday after the judgement was handed down, it’s expected the state will appeal the judgement all the way up to the constitutional court. However, given the reasoning of Judge Sutherland and the indiscriminate nature of the mass surveillance by South African government agencies, Professor Duncan and others involved believe the state will lose every appeal, even at the constitutional court.
This is partly because, in handing down judgement, Judge Sutherland noted how inconsistent with South Africa’s constitution the mass surveillance was. This is definitely a big win for privacy and media freedom in South Africa. Here’s to hoping it sets a precedent for the rest of the world to follow.
South African court rules against mass surveillance
Menstruation apps are sending data to Facebook
Analysis of the historic privacy and surveillance judgement in South Africa
Kick-starting startup investements in Africa
Garmin hacked and customer credit card details stolen
Facebook wants to be your matchmaker
Ancestors - game with insight into how we evolved
Read This Book
Drawing on her own powerful story as the daughter of a scientist who frequently noted her lack of “genius,” Angela Duckworth, now a celebrated researcher and professor, describes her early eye-opening stints in teaching, business consulting, and neuroscience, which led to the hypothesis that what really drives success is not “genius” but a unique combination of passion and long-term perseverance.
In Grit: The Power of Passion and Perseverance, she takes readers into the field to visit cadets struggling through their first days at West Point, teachers working in some of the toughest schools, and young finalists in the National Spelling Bee.
Grit: The Power of Passion and Perseverance
Duckworth also mines fascinating insights from history and shows what can be gleaned from modern experiments in peak performance. Finally, she shares what she’s learned from interviewing dozens of high achievers—from JP Morgan CEO, Jamie Dimon, to New Yorker cartoon editor Bob Mankoff to Seattle Seahawks Coach Pete Carroll.
Winningly personal, insightful, and even life-changing, Grit: The Power of Passion and Perseverance is a book about what goes through your head when you fall down, and how that—not talent or luck—makes all the difference.
“…there are no shortcuts to excellence. Developing real expertise, figuring out really hard problems, it all takes time―longer than most people imagine….you’ve got to apply those skills and produce goods or services that are valuable to people…Grit is about working on something you care about so much that you’re willing to stay loyal to it…it’s doing what you love, but not just falling in love―staying in love.” - Angela Duckworth
Enjoy the read. Ndzalo Mpangana
Did you enjoy this issue?
If you don't want these updates anymore, please unsubscribe here
If you were forwarded this newsletter and you like it, you can subscribe here
Powered by Revue